Language Access in Healthcare
ClaimC-0237Initial AI draft

Improving translation quality does not improve LEP patient comprehension, while changing the delivery format does

2026-06-052 out · 7 in

Narrative synthesis #

On the only comprehension outcome measured in the cluster, improving translation quality did not help: LEP adults understood treatment intent equally poorly whether a SACT booklet was machine- or professionally translated (multivariate OR 0.99), with only 15.7% grasping intent either way. Changing the delivery format did move comprehension — a bilingual (interlinear) consent form raised understanding of non-curative intent from 34.8% to 60.0% (OR 3.73) — though the Total Comprehension Score effect held in univariate but not multivariate models, an internal qualifier worth keeping.

This is one trial plus corroborating qualitative data, not a body of evidence: five of the seven EVDs are Hibbs, with two provider-interview EVDs from Allar. State it as such. Merge candidates (proposal only — do not touch): C-0131, C-0132, C-0134, C-0135, C-0190.