Language Access in Healthcare
EvidenceE-0375Initial AI draft

Both groups rated the three demonstrated apps as moderately to highly easy to use and satisfactory

2026-06-056 out · 0 in

Source

Panayiotou (2020). The perceptions of translation apps for everyday health care in healthcare workers and older people: A multi-method study. Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Description #

In the post-demonstration appraisal survey, both older CALD participants and healthcare staff rated the three apps (TalkToMe, CALD Assist, Google Translate) as moderately to highly easy to use and satisfactory (Table 4). Older CALD participants rated all three similarly, with median ease of use of 4.5-5.0 (0-10 scale); healthcare staff rated ease of use higher (median 7.5-9.0), with similar overall satisfaction (median 3.0-4.0 on a 0-5 scale).

"On a Likert scale from 0-10, median ease of use ranged from 4.5-5.0, with TalkToMe and Google Translate™ both receiving the highest ratings." (Panayiotou, 2020, p. 3522)

"Healthcare staff reported higher perceived ease of use and similar levels of overall satisfaction. Median ease of use ranged from 7.5-9.0, and median overall satisfaction ranged from 3.0-4.0, with CALD Assist receiving the highest ratings on both of these (Table 4)." (Panayiotou, 2020, p. 3523)

Methods Context #

What? #

The observable: self-rated ease of use and overall satisfaction with each of three demonstrated translation apps.

"The translation apps were appraised using rating scales regarding the ease of use (0 = not at all easy to use, 10 very easy to use) and for satisfaction, on a scale of 0-5 (0 = not satisfied at all, 5 = very highly satisfied)." (Panayiotou, 2020, p. 3519)

How? #

Descriptive-statistics analysis of a survey completed after ~5-10 minutes of hands-on interaction with each of three iPad apps (A-0018, A-0017, A-0016); rating scales based on the System Usability Scale.

"These translation apps were demonstrated by the research team, and participants spent approximately 5–10 min interacting with and appraising each app on iPads provided by the research team." (Panayiotou, 2020, p. 3519)

Who? #

Older Greek and Chinese CALD community members (n = 12) and nursing/allied health staff (n = 17) in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia.

"Participants from the CALD community groups rated the three apps similarly in terms of their perceived ease of use and overall satisfaction." (Panayiotou, 2020, p. 3522)

Other Notes #

Quantitative appraisal finding. The finding lives in Table 4 (Appraisal of translation apps); no extracted table asset is available in the vault, so grounded by page-located verbatim text.

Caveats #

  • Appraisal survey was exploratory and its validity was not assessed The app ease-of-use and satisfaction ratings come from a survey the authors describe as exploratory: although based on the System Usability Scale, the items were simplified for readability and the instrument's validity was not assessed. The median ratings should therefore be read as indicative appraisal signals from a brief hands-on demonstration, not validated usability measurements.